Hi Rad,
I was reflecting in the part of sag that correlates, to travel, meetings other cultures and so on.
And reading about pluto in sag, in a way say that because of sag could be too much fixed in his own belief or truth needs to meet gemini to give him multiperspective, there is not only one truth, everything is relative...
So In my mind I cant penetrate fully the arquetipe, because it seems to me that is precisely traveling, expanding your vision and meeting other cultures what give you the multiperspective view.
Could you share some light into it.
Thanks
Iñaki
Hi Iñaki,
Commonly with Pluto in the 9th or Sagittarius the Soul has an existing philosophy or religious doctrine that has be used to 'interpret' the nature of phenomenal reality so that even as they may travel about, etc, all is interpreted from that existing point of view in order to sustain psychological, emotional, security wherein that security is dependent of remaining self consistent relative to the existing philosophy or religious doctrine.
The Gemini, 3rd House polarity for the 9th House Pluto, archetype is thus necessary in order to encounter others who have the capacity to point out the weak links in the underpinnings of the philosophical or religious doctrine being used by such a Soul. The intention of course is to evolve beyond the preexisting philosophical or religious doctrine.
God Bless, Rad
Thank you Rad!
Do you think there is a way to be completely free of beliefs systems and interpretations?
I have tried so hard and still not arrived. I was totally disappointed with consensus beliefs and I move to individuated philosophers. But then I find it was too much theorical world vision. Then discover meditation and was and opening, wow I can see for myself without having to believe anything, only observe, same with jeffrey explaining the 1, 2. You don't need to believe just observe. Up to the point that now I'm living in a monastery studying meditation, and despite I'm making big progress, and everything is based in cultivate direct perception without believing... I still see that there is some interpretation and belief system involve . Also in EA when I discover I start to correlate symbols and realize many things where real. But still, because I know up to some point vedanta, I see the big influence of yogananda and vedanta (also a religion) in EA. Soul unite with the source is the classic atman Brahman, and the metaphore of the waves and the ocean is taken directly from the upanishads, etc etc. Even astrology being a symbolic language, like all the languages is a way to interpret reality.
Is enlighment free of interpretation? The silence of the saints.
Im arriving to the conclusion that every time we open the mouth and say a word we are interpreting reality, and real truth flies away...
What do you think?
Hi Sunya,
EA is rooted in Natural Laws. Natural Laws are that which can be known, and does not require beliefs. Expressing those Natural Laws requires being able to describe those Natural Laws via language. Language of course is rooted in words. Words can describe those Natural Laws that are not rooted in beliefs, but direct perception.
There of course is a manifest Creation that is comprised of the sum total of all Natural Laws that combine is a variety of ways equaling the totality of the manifest Creation. That manifest Creation is not a function of belied, but a manifested fact. One of those natural facts is birth and death. One of those manifest facts in consciousness. One of those manifest facts is intelligence relative to consciousness. The birth and death of consciousness relative to fact of natural forms within the manifest Creation exists. From these natural facts that do not require beliefs various philosophies or religions can build themselves relative to those natural facts. Thus thus the intersection between that will is Natural Law(s) and 'beliefs' that can then distort those Natural Laws: facts.
A perfect example is the one you site from Vedanta and other philosophies/ religions wherein the natural fact, Law, of consciousness manifests in individual human forms. That individual human form with consciousness within it is then 'named', a word to describe a natural fact, the Soul and is birthed, and dies, through the Natural Laws, facts, of time and space. Thus the Natural Law of evolution. These Natural Laws, facts, can be directly inwardly known, not believed, by any Soul because all Souls manifest from that which set in motion the manifest Creation in the first place. This is a universal fact, Natural Law, that all Souls in human form can actually know through direct experience relative to the Natural Law, fact. of breath within the human form. Etc.
In the end it becomes essential for all Souls to understand that intersection between that with is naturally true that does not require beliefs of any kind, and that which in not true that does REQUIRE BELIEFS TO MAKE SOMETHING TRUE when in fact it is not.
God Bless, Rad
Thank you Rad for helping me to see the point, from facts natural philosophies arise. I was probably looking to the finger instead of the moon.
Another question, I guess not an easy one.
There are great investigation of some writers, I think they are real, but I don't know the writers I didn't make the investigation myself, so ultimately could be true, but could be also not true, without using this studies, just from personal direct perception...
What do you think is the actual fact, or direct perception that prove reincarnation?
Sorry if it seems that I'm trying to deconstruct and putting in doubt everything... Actually I am. I guess I'm trying to find a place for EA in my consciousness with sense. That's why all the questions.
Natal neptune in sag in the 4th is in the middle of a transit sandwich. One slide of bread a conjuction with trans jupiter, the other slide a square with trans neptune.
A delicious salad of natal stelium in libra (pluto incl) with transit stelium. And others delicatessens.
Make alltogether
The perfect dinner of doubts. A beliefs barbacue.
Hi Sunya,
The natural law, fact, that energy can not be destroyed. It can only change form. Energy of individuated consciousness from life to life.
Beyond that the past life memories themselves that some Souls have. In very evolved Souls they can know there own prior lives, and those of others as well. For the most part this remains silent within them.
I understand your process of deconstructing .. it's actually healthy for any Soul to do. But please try to minimize that process here because the focus is to teach EA itself.
God Bless, Rad
Thanks Rad. I understand this is for teaching EA. Sorry if it seems my questions where oriented to others places but my questions were actually born from reading EA literature, and I think they are related to EA topics. Soul, sag gemini axis, rebirth ans so on. I will not mention any personal context in the future. And stick only to the topic.
Hi all,
"In the end it becomes essential for all Souls to understand that intersection between that with is naturally true that does not require beliefs of any kind, and that which in not true that does REQUIRE BELIEFS TO MAKE SOMETHING TRUE when in fact it is not."
This is so important right now with Jupiter in Sagittarius, to be honest about the difference between what we know and what we believe.
Sunya, proof is a personal thing, for one to know about the reality of reincarnation one needs to experience it for one's self. There are various ways to do so, such as through regression.
All the best